nof1l.gif (4731 bytes)


F1 Merchandise

Formula 1 news, results and statistics when you need it

The year of the prancing horse   
18 November 2002 Volume 4 - Issue 29   

blank.gif (809 bytes)
blank.gif (809 bytes)
Main Page
Formula 1 News
2015 F1 Schedule
2015 F1 Line-up
2014 F1 Schedule
F1 Teams
F1 Drivers
NewsOnF1 Mobile
10 'n' Pole
Register - Submit
F1 Regulations
The Forums
Live F1 Coverage
Motorsport Shop
UK - USA
Motorsport Calendar

F1 Merchandise UK
F1 Merchandise USA

F1 Tours
F1 Tickets
F1 Diecast
F1 Videos
F1 Games
F1 Trivia
NewsOnF1 on Twitter
MotoGP Tickets
Past Formula 1 Seasons
2012 F1 Results
2011 F1 Results
2010 F1 Results
2009 F1 Results
2008 F1 Results
2007 F1 Results
2006 F1 Results
2005 F1 Results
2004 F1 Results
2003 F1 Results

2002 F1 Results

2001 F1 Results

2000 F1 Results

1999 F1 Results

1998 F1 Results

1997 F1 Results
Links
2010 World Cup
Translate
Search
Contact Us
About
Archives
Your Say
Diagnosis & Prognosis
By the Heretic
Controversy Corner
The Real Race
By the Quali-flyer
F1 Testing
F1 Team Reports
8 'n' Pole
2006 World Cup

Download the NewsOnF1.com
toolbar
powered by Alexa

There is no doubt that Ferrari has established themselves as the dominant team in 2002 and that Michael Schumacher is equally dominant as a driver.

Apart from the most number of pole positions Michael has now equalled or bettered all records. He has always been a force to reckon with but this year he was invincible in a car that was fast and reliable.

At the start of the season it looked like Ferrari may have to fight off Williams who were showing signs of being as fast, if not faster, in the right weather conditions. Williams seemed to have far better tyres in hot and dry conditions.

Some luck with weather, further developments by Bridgestone and huge improvements by the Ferrari engineers soon put an end to that. I was never sure that Bridgestone did manage to catch up with Michelin but they certainly closed the gap enough for the Ferrari advantage to shine through.

After that it was over. Montoya still managed to qualify well but when it mattered Michael was unbeatable winning 11 races in the season. Rubens won 4 of the remaining races and Coulthard and Ralf Schumacher won the other two races. Michael also finished on the podium in every race showing that the Ferrari was not only fast but very reliable.

Montoya was consistently fast in qualifying but was unable to convert that to a good finish. If he did not break his car he frequently looked as if he had given up and, with all his problems Ralf seemed kinder to his car and at least won a single race (Malaysia). Neither driver inspired me.

The early part of the season McLaren were awful. Not only were the cars unreliable but when they did finish they were slow. Halfway through the season they were gaining on the Williams team and by the end of the season they were as fast AS the Williams cars if not faster.

Had the season continued they may have challenged Ferrari (Coulthard did win at Monaco) but now they will have to wait until next year.

Both McLaren drivers showed strength. Coulthard as a calm and consistently fast driver that never stopped trying Raikkonen as a very talented driver that will be very good once he overcomes the hot headedness of youth.

Renault did not start the season very well either but has finished very well, clearly establishing themselves as the best of the rest. Their controversial, lower engine structure had a lot of problems early in the season, to the extent that I started thinking that it will never succeed, but whatever they did towards the end of the season it started showing some promise.

Jenson Button struggled to repeat the form he displayed with Williams and, although he finished better in the driver’s championship, did not look much faster than teammate Trulli.

Sauber, with the 2001 Ferrari engine, did very well in the early part of the season. As the year rolled on it was obvious that their engine was not being developed and it was as good as it could get. Heidfeld seemed to drive very well but Massa consistently drove as if he stole the car and frequently retired because of a silly mistake or misjudgement.

Of the Honda powered cars it was Jordan that did better and there Fisichella did a much better job than co driver Sato who never looked comfortable.

Jaguar eventually got their cars going but could do no better than split the Honda powered cars, earning one point more than BAR and one less than Jordan. Eddie Irvine never inspired me but even he can’t be blamed for the poor performance of the Jag. It was consistently pathetic with occasional flashes of speed. Pedro de la Rosa inspires me even less and certainly did nothing during this season to change my mind.

Villeneuve drove the wheels off the BAR even though it was obvious that it was not fast enough to do anything better than just make it into the points, if it finishes. I like Villeneuve because he always puts in 100%, even when winning is not possible.
Panis, on the other hand, was more accepting of his lot and drove accordingly.

The rest: Toyota, Minardi and Arrows did not do well at all. Toyota has a lot to organize and perfect before they can climb up the ranks. Ferrari demonstrated how long it took to build the entire car and become competitive so we will have to wait to see how good Toyota can get. Their drivers did not shine but that could have been the car.

Arrows are in financial trouble. A bit of a chicken and egg problem. Are they broke because they did so badly that their sponsors are abandoning them? Or are their sponsors abandoning them because they are broke?
Either way their performance, that started out poorly, just got worse to the extent that they were competing with Minardi for the last positions.

At Minardi Mark Webber attracted attention by making the car seem better than what it is and Alex Yoong made it seem worse than it really is. Mark may go places but the only places that Alex seems to consistently go to are the sand traps.

It was a year of financial turmoil for several teams highlighting the fact that Formula One is now getting to be too expensive for all but the large car manufacturers. Prost failed financially before the season even started, Arrows could not afford to start some races and the TV money initially earmarked for Prost saved Minardi.

Are we seeing the demise of the independent teams?

Agree or disagree ?
Please submit any comments you have on this commentary below

Your comments and the Heretic's reply could be published on NewsOnF1.

Name:
Email address:
Country:

Comments:

Previous Heretic Issues
The Heretic's Season Preview

Back to Top


Loading


Official 2004 F1 Season Review

Autocourse 2004 Annual

F1 World Championship Yearbook 2004

The Official Tribute To Ayrton Senna
1960 To 1994

Formula 1 Technical Analysis: 2003

Chariot Makers: Assembling the Perfect Formula 1 Car

The Science of
F1 Design

The Complete Book of Formula One: All Cars and Drivers Since 1950

Formula 1 Books

Race Driving Books

Race Car Design Books

Magazine Stand


Ayrton Senna

Past Formula 1 Drivers